Stop Writing Like a Robot: The Email Revolution Your Workplace Actually Needs

Connect with us: SB Nation | Medium | Doodle or Die | Pexels | Morguefile

Here's something that'll make you uncomfortable: most of your workplace writing is absolute garbage, and everyone knows it except you.

I discovered this harsh truth three years ago when I accidentally sent a draft email to our entire client database instead of my assistant. The email contained gems like "as per our previous conversation" (we'd never spoken), "please find attached" (nothing was attached), and my personal favourite, "I hope this email finds you well" followed immediately by terrible news about project delays.

The response was... enlightening. Forty-seven clients replied. Not one mentioned the project delays. They all wanted to know why I sounded like a malfunctioning corporate chatbot.

The Australian Workplace Writing Crisis Nobody Talks About

We've created a generation of workers who think professional communication means drowning every message in bureaucratic nonsense. Walk through any Sydney office, peek at screens, and you'll see the same tragic pattern: emails that take four paragraphs to say what could be said in one sentence.

"I trust this email finds you in good health and spirits. I am writing to you today in regards to the matter we discussed during our meeting on Tuesday, 15th October, concerning the potential possibility of perhaps considering..."

STOP. Just bloody stop.

Here's what I've learned after fifteen years of fixing workplace communication disasters: effective writing isn't about sounding smart. It's about being understood quickly by busy people who couldn't care less about your vocabulary.

This revelation hit me during a project with Westpac's training department. Their internal communications were so convoluted that managers were scheduling meetings to discuss emails about scheduling other meetings. The productivity loss was staggering.

Why Your Current Writing Training is Completely Wrong

Most business writing training focuses on grammar rules and formal structures. That's like teaching someone to drive by having them memorise the highway code without ever seeing a car.

Real workplace writing happens under pressure. Deadlines looming. Phone ringing. Boss hovering. Your carefully crafted prose needs to work in these conditions, not in some pristine writing retreat.

I've watched brilliant engineers completely fail at project documentation because they were taught that "professional" means "complicated". Meanwhile, a tradie with year-ten English sends clearer, more actionable emails than most university graduates.

The problem isn't intelligence. It's methodology.

The Three-Second Rule That Changes Everything

Every piece of workplace writing should pass the three-second test: can a stranger understand the main point within three seconds of reading?

Not three minutes. Three seconds.

This sounds impossible until you realise how much mental energy you waste on unnecessary words. Consider these before-and-after examples from actual emails I've rescued:

Before: "I would like to take this opportunity to inform you that we have encountered some unexpected challenges in relation to the project timeline, and as such, we may need to explore the possibility of extending the completion date."

After: "The project will be two weeks late due to supplier delays."

Same information. Fraction of the time. Zero confusion.

But here's where most people get it wrong: they think this means being rude or abrupt. Wrong again.

The Personality Problem in Professional Writing

Somewhere along the way, Australian workplaces decided that professional writing meant removing all traces of human personality. This is insane.

Your colleagues and clients are real people. They respond to real human communication. When you write like a corporation instead of a person, you're actually being less professional, not more.

I learned this lesson the hard way during a consulting project with a Perth mining company. Their safety reports were so sterile and formal that workers weren't reading them. Critical safety information was being ignored because it was buried in corporate-speak.

We rewrote everything in plain English. Used contractions. Added some personality. Included real stories from real workers.

Incident reports dropped by 34% in six months. Not because the workplace became safer overnight, but because people finally understood the safety procedures.

The Email Epidemic Destroying Your Career

Let's talk about email specifically because it's where most workplace writing sins occur.

The average Australian office worker sends 47 emails per day. If even half of those emails require clarification or follow-up because they're poorly written, you're essentially doubling your email workload.

Multiply that across your team, your department, your entire organisation. The productivity loss is staggering.

Yet somehow, we keep writing emails like it's 1995. Subject lines that say nothing. Messages that bury the action item in paragraph three. Reply chains that go seventeen messages deep because nobody can write a clear request.

Here's my controversial opinion: if your email is longer than two paragraphs, you're probably doing it wrong.

Yes, complex topics exist. But most workplace emails aren't discussing quantum physics. They're asking for updates, sharing information, or requesting action. These conversations don't require novels.

The Meeting Minutes Revolution

Want to see terrible workplace writing in its natural habitat? Check your organisation's meeting minutes.

"John mentioned that there might be some considerations around the potential implementation of the proposed solution, pending further investigation into the feasibility aspects."

What does that even mean? What is John going to do? When? How will we know if he's done it?

Compare that with: "John will research costs for the new software by Friday and email recommendations to the team."

Specific. Actionable. Measurable.

I once attended a meeting management workshop where the facilitator spent three hours teaching complex minute-taking templates. Meanwhile, participants couldn't write a simple action item that anyone could understand.

We're solving the wrong problem.

The Technology Trap

Modern workplaces are drowning in communication tools. Slack, Teams, Zoom, email, WhatsApp, carrier pigeons... okay, maybe not the last one.

But here's the thing: better tools don't fix bad writing. They just help you share terrible communication faster and with more people.

I've seen Slack channels where simple questions generate forty-message threads because nobody can write a clear, complete answer. The tool isn't the problem. The communication skills are.

What Actually Works: The Pyramid Method

Forget everything you learned about introductions and conclusions. Workplace writing should be structured like an inverted pyramid:

Top: The most important information first
Middle: Supporting details
Bottom: Background context (if needed)

This isn't revolutionary journalism theory. It's basic human psychology. People scan, they don't read. Give them what they need immediately, then provide context for those who want it.

Example: "The client presentation is moved from Tuesday to Wednesday at 2pm in Conference Room B. Sarah will update the PowerPoint tonight. Please review your sections by 10am Wednesday."

Everything important in the first sentence. Supporting details follow. No fluff, no corporate padding.

The Confidence Problem

Here's something nobody talks about: most workplace writing problems stem from confidence issues, not skill deficits.

People write in corporate-speak because they're afraid of sounding unprofessional. They add unnecessary qualifiers because they're worried about being too direct. They hedge everything because they don't want to seem arrogant.

"I was just wondering if it might be possible to perhaps consider..."

Mate, you're not wondering. You're asking. Just ask.

This confidence issue is particularly pronounced in Australian workplaces where tall poppy syndrome meets corporate culture. We're simultaneously afraid of sounding too casual and too formal.

The solution? Practice being direct in low-stakes situations. Internal emails with trusted colleagues. Team updates. Project notes.

Build your confidence with friendly audiences before tackling high-pressure communication.

The Editing Revolution

Most people think editing means checking for typos. That's proofreading, not editing.

Real editing means asking: "What can I remove without losing meaning?"

Every sentence should earn its place. Every word should have a purpose. If you can't explain why something is there, delete it.

I call this the Marie Kondo approach to workplace writing. Does this paragraph spark productivity? No? Thank it for its service and let it go.

The Generational Writing Divide

Here's where things get interesting. Different generations have completely different writing expectations in the workplace.

Millennials want bullet points and action items. Gen X prefers context and background. Boomers expect formal structure and proper introductions.

Smart writers adapt their style to their audience. Your email to the 25-year-old project coordinator should look different from your report to the 55-year-old department head.

This isn't about dumbing down or complicating up. It's about communication effectiveness.

The Remote Work Writing Challenge

COVID changed everything about workplace communication. Suddenly, writing became the primary way teams stay connected.

But most people weren't prepared for this shift. They went from having conversations at desks to having conversations through text. The skills don't translate automatically.

Written communication in remote teams needs to be more explicit, more detailed, and more frequent than face-to-face communication. You can't rely on body language, tone of voice, or casual desk conversations to fill in the gaps.

This requires a fundamental shift in how we think about workplace writing. It's not just about documenting decisions anymore. It's about building relationships, maintaining culture, and keeping teams aligned.

The Real Solution (Finally)

Want to transform your workplace writing overnight? Start with this simple framework:

1. State the purpose in the first sentence
2. Provide necessary details
3. Include clear next steps
4. Stop writing

That's it. No complex templates, no corporate training modules, no advanced writing workshops required.

Most workplace writing fails because people overcomplicate simple concepts. They think more words equals more professional. They confuse clarity with casualness.

The best workplace writers I know follow one rule: respect your reader's time by getting to the point quickly and clearly.

Everything else is just noise.

The Bottom Line

Your workplace writing reflects your thinking. Unclear writing suggests unclear thinking. Overly complex writing suggests insecurity or confusion.

Clear, direct writing suggests competence and confidence. It demonstrates respect for your colleagues' time and intelligence.

In fifteen years of consulting, I've never met a successful leader who couldn't communicate clearly in writing. The correlation is too strong to ignore.

So here's my challenge: for the next week, apply the three-second rule to everything you write. If someone can't understand your main point within three seconds, rewrite it.

Your colleagues will thank you. Your career will benefit. And you might just start a writing revolution in your workplace.

Which, frankly, is long overdue.